The iPad mini as e-reader

ipadminiI have had an iPad for a while now. It’s an iPad 2. That worked ok as an e-reader, but now I finally got my hands on an iPad mini.

The obvious difference between the bigger iPad and the mini version is the size and weight. The iPad 2 didn’t feel heavy at all until I started to play with this smaller one. There’s a really big difference. The reading experience is so much better and you can read for a longer time.

I can imagine that the smaller screen might be a problem for some people, but it’s easy enough to change the font size in your preferred app. I mostly read in iBooks (bought and free ebooks) and BlueFire (library books).

The variety of file formats is a great asset. You can read html, txt, pdf, mobi (with the kindle app), and of course epub, which is really important. I also have a Kindle which has e-ink and has a brilliant screen, but doesn’t use epub.

Battery time isn’t all that good compared to dedicated e-readers. I have to charge mine every day, but of course I use it for much more than just reading. And the fact that you can use it for other things like email, texting, chat, surfing, blogging etc makes it a very useful tool.

Summary:

+ size and weight
+ many formats especially epub
+ other functions except ebook reading
– battery time/+ excellent battery time for a backlit device though

A little outing

2013-04-26 08.00.34
The former railway station

Yesterday, my sister and I went on a little outing. We were going to look at some land we were thinking about buying. We thought it would be a fun outing and that there would be no complications. After all, we’d just get on a train and get off after about an hour. In a way, things worked out fine. We got off on the right station, only to find that there was no actual station – just an old station building that was closed. That meant we’d have no way of buying our return tickets.

Since there was nothing else we could do, we set off to take a look at the land. Unfortunately, it didn’t suit us all. It was just a slope, no flat land anywhere. Building a house there would be difficult, if not impossible. On the bright side, it was far closer to the railway than we’d thought. It took us five minutes to get there, at the most

2013-04-26 08.03.15
The former courthouse

The village itself was eerie. We saw a very odd cat walking some distance away. At least we think it was a cat. In fact, in the half hour we were there, we hardly saw any people at all. There were two girls going to a bus stop – probably going to school. It was eight in the morning. We saw a woman on a bike who almost fell off, when she caught sight of two strangers. There was another woman, walking her two very odd dogs. We’ve never seen any dogs like that before. They were sort of like border collies except much smaller and thinner. About the size of miniature schnauzers or pinschers.

Then we walked back, and noticed that the tiny store was open (not ‘open’ for customers – just open).

2013-04-26 08.03.21
The former something, now appartment building

I went inside and talked to a very nice guy who was putting out produce and setting things in order before the store opened. He was very polite and sympathetic but there was nowhere in that tiny village/town where we could buy our return tickets. Which was discouraging. How on earth would we get back without tickets? The staff on the train have taken to turning unpaying travellers out at the first possible stop, even they’d have no way of getting home on their own. Children, old people, anyone.

Fortunately, for us, that never happened. We discovered that since we only stayed barely half an hour, we could ride back for the same fare. It was good for three hours. So we managed to get home, but apart from that we were back to square one.

Why you can’t argue with an meat eater!

Of course, I could just as well have substituted meat eater for religious, racist, misogynist… Why, do you say? In short, it comes down to values.

Let me give you a few examples. If you want to discuss whether or not God exists – do you think it would be a good idea to list proof that God doesn’t exists? Probably not, because if you’re a faithful believer proof isn’t part of the equation. Either you believe or you don’t, as simple as that.

Let me give a similar example with another belief system – racism. The racists in this example truly believe that black people have less intelligence than white people. They even provide proof that they have smaller brains. Would that matter? Probably not, because in your belief system there isn’t any difference in intelligence between these two groups. And the racists believe that it’s true. Would you two have a fruitful discussion? The most likely outcome is that at least one of you will walk away in anger and no one would have changed their minds.

Now, I’ll go back to where I started, with the meat eater – or omnivore which is a better description, since no human is a carnivore like, for instance, a lion. In this example this omnivore will discuss the matter about eating meat with a vegan. The omnivore truly believes it’s ok to eat the flesh of another living creature as long as it’s one of the animals that is classified as a provider of meat. Where this line goes is a bit blurry, but it could be cows and pigs, but not dogs. The vegan truly believes that it’s not right to eat the flesh of any other living creature. Would a discussion about veganism be fruitful between these two? Would either of them change their minds after the discussion? Probably not.

I realize that there are different kinds of vegans, but in this case I’m talking about ethical vegans (which is the normal definition of vegan – ethical strict vegetarian). I’m sure an omnivore would have a fair shot in the discussion with someone who is vegan only for health reasons, providing facts about health issues. And the vegan might have a shot if the omnivore has mixed feelings of eating meat, but perhaps believes it might not be healthy to change or s/he might be afraid that his/her knowledge wouldn’t be enough for a change.

In any case, take a look at yourself. Why do you want to engage in a discussion with someone whose values are completely different from yours? If the reason is to learn about how other people think, then go for it. That’s usually why I discuss with religious people (about religion). To understand them better. Their belief system is so far removed from my own.

If the reason is that you’re frustrated with how things are – that’s usually why I engage in discussions with omnivores (about meat eating) – then think twice. Do you really think you can change their values? If not, perhaps you should step away. You’ll only end up even more frustrated.

If the reason is that you want to ridicule the other person, think again. One day you’ll meet someone that’s better at it.

Values is the key here. They are so much harder to change, both for yourself and for the one you are talking with. Accept them as they are. At least for the time being. Not because you think they are doing the right thing. In my case, there are days when I just want to shake some sense into them, to make them see that they are eating sentient beings that have just as much right to live as they do. And there are days when I still cry over all the poor animals that suffer and die because some people want to eat their flesh. I still wish for a peaceful world where animals and humans can live in peace side by side. But that Utopia is so far away. No matter how much I want it to happen, arguments won’t change the values of other people. At least not in the short run. In time, I hope that things will change.

Instead, try just showing them a good example. Show them that it’s alright to hang out with people from another country. They are just like you and me. Show them that it’s perfectly healthy to eat vegan food, that it’s just as tasty and tell them about how individual your pets are. That they get sad and happy just as you do. Show them that gay people are no different from others.

Unfortunately, at the moment, that’s all you can do. Just do what’s right, set a good example and hope for the best.

My first impressions of HTC Desire C

This isn’t going to be one of those comparisons iOS/Android that focuses on pushing buttons and counting tenths of seconds. If you expect such a post, you might be a little disappointed. This is just going to be a description of my first impression of a fun toy.

On first sight, the box tells you this is a budget phone you’re dealing with. The box is made of styrofoam and there’s just a printed paper banner around the box to show which phone it is. Despite that, I’m as happy as a kid on Christmas, as always when I’m facing a new gadget. This time is no exeption.

The phone itself is surprisingly small and light. It almost seems as if the phone has been delivered without a battery. Obviously that’s not the case. The battery is there and the phone quickly begins to charge. 30 % from the start, the 40, 50 and so on. Impressively fast.

The phone is cute and the back has a silky smooth rubber-like surface. When you open it to remove the protective film from the battery, you’ll notice that it’s red, just like the inside of the phone. Cool idea. The protective film covering the battery, confused me at first. I’m not used to that. I even had to go find an online manual about how to start using the phone. There I also learned how to insert my fingernail to pry off the back cover and how to insert the sim card.

Once I’d managed to open up the phone, I was able to adjust the settings. Some I simply had to ignore, because I didn’t know where and how they’d be used, such as place settings. I wouldn’t want my photos to have info about where they’ve been taken. The phone is easy to use and doesn’t feel too strange to me.†

All in all, my first contact with HTC Desire C and also Android phones is a positive one.

Which fantasy writer are you?

Your result for Which fantasy writer are you?…

Philip Pullman (b.1946)

17 High-Brow, -17 Violent, 1 Experimental and 17 Cynical!

Congratulations! You are High-Brow, Peaceful, Experimental and Cynical! These concepts are defined below.

Philip Pullman was already a prominent author of children’s books when he published his most praised work to date, the trilogy known as His Dark Materials (1995-2000). In this work, set both in parallel worlds and our own, Pullman made a courageous attempt to write a book for young readers which incorporated a whole vision of the universe, as well as a discussion of ethical issues. He managed to combine this with a burst of thought-provoking and entertaining imagination, bringing to life a Europe where the church is still in control, “souls” that have been externalised as animal presences, intelligent, sentient polar bears and much more. The series have been described as a sort of “anti-Narnia”, as Pullman’s attempt to write an updated variant of the kind of books C S Lewis, whom Pullman has criticized for having racist, misogynic and preaching tendencies, wanted to write. His Dark Materials has also spawned some controversy among Christians, who see the the work as an attack against Christianity, Pullman being one of Britain’s most outspoken atheists. Other Christians have, however, claimed to have found spirituality in the books. 

Either way, Pullman’s combination of renewal and expansion of the genre, his profound messages on the value of life and his refusal to under-estimate his young readers’ ability to see life as it is makes Pullman one of the most interesting and important writers of modern fantasy.

You are also a lot like Tove Jansson.

If you want something some action, try Gene Wolfe.

If you’d like a challenge, try your exact opposite, J R R Tolkien.

Your score

This is how to interpret your score: Your attitudes have been measured on four different scales, called 1) High-Brow vs. Low-Brow, 2) Violent vs. Peaceful, 3) Experimental vs. Traditional and 4) Cynical vs. Romantic. Imagine that when you were born, you were in a state of innocence, a tabula rasa who would have scored zero on each scale. Since then, a number of circumstances (including genetical, cultural and environmental factors) have pushed you towards either end of these scales. If you’re at 45 or -45 you would be almost entirely cynical, low-brow or whatever. The closer to zero you are, the less extreme your attitude. However, you should always be more of either (eg more romantic than cynical). Please note that even though High-Brow, Violent, Experimental and Cynical have positive numbers (1 through 45) and their opposites negative numbers (-1 through -45), this doesn’t mean that either quality is better. All attitudes have their positive and negative sides, as explained below.

High-Brow vs Low-Brow

You received 17 points, making you more High-Brow than Low-Brow. Being high-browed in this context refers to being more fascinated with the sort of art that critics and scholars tend to favour, rather than the best-selling kind. At their best, high-brows are cultured, able to appreciate the finer nuances of literature and not content with simplifications. At their worst they are, well, snobs.

Violent vs. Peaceful

 

You received -17 points, making you more Peaceful than Violent.  This scale is a measurement of a) if you are tolerant to violence in fiction and b) whether you see violence as a means that can be used to achieve a good end. If you aren’t, and you don’t, then you are peaceful as defined here. At their best, peaceful people are the ones who encourage dialogue and understanding as a means of solving conflicts. At their worst, they are standing passively by as they or third parties are hurt by less scrupulous individuals.

Experimental vs. Traditional

You received 1 points, making you more Experimental than Traditional. Your position on this scale indicates if you’re more likely to seek out the new and unexpected or if you are more comfortable with the familiar, especially in regards to culture. Note that traditional as defined here does not equal conservative, in the political sense. At their best, experimental people are the ones who show humanity the way forward. At their worst, they provoke for the sake of provocation only.

Cynical vs Romantic

You received 17 points, making you more Cynical than Romantic. Your position on this scale indicates if you are more likely to be wary, suspicious and skeptical to people around you and the world at large, or if you are more likely to believe in grand schemes, happy endings and the basic goodness of humankind. It is by far the most vaguely defined scale, which is why you’ll find the sentence “you are also a lot like x” above. If you feel that your position on this scale is wrong, then you are probably more like author x. At their best, cynical people are able to see through lies and spot crucial flaws in plans and schemes. At their worst, they are overly negative, bringing everybody else down.

Take Which fantasy writer are you? at HelloQuizzy

Ingegerd Råman – simplicity and function in a aestetic mix

In my work, I want to join simplicity, function and aesthetics. A jar with a lid is a jar with a lid. But there must be warmth, thought and idea and poetry behind it, Ingegerd explains. Ingegerd Råman

I rarely find an individual designer that really impresses me. That the designer is nice too, is even more rare, but Ingegerd Råman is one of them. She’s also completely without prestige and doesn’t seem to try to be something she isn’t. And why should she? What she is is something really rare in designer Sweden.

Usually a vase or a lightbulb is just what it seems to be, but in the hands of Råman, the glass turns into art. Her designs are simple but still really unique. Pure elegance.

Haunted library

Have you experienced something you couldn’t explain? Do you believe in ghosts? I don’t, not really, but still…

The floor is creaking slightly. I look around to see if someone is behind me, but I can’t see anyone. Even though I’m used to it by now, I stand up and look around in the empty library. Yes it’s empty despite the fact that I can hear the faint sound of footsteps. …or am I only imagining things?

Could someone be hiding behind one of the bookshelves? I shrug and decide to go back to what I was doing. It’s one of the calmer days.
Knowing that there are no such things as ghosts, I still check to position of the rocking chair when I come to work and when I’m leaving. Today is no different, it’s moved again, not much, only enough for me to notice. Who’s been using it? No one knows.

The presence, if there’s one, isn’t threatening or scary. We’re sharing the library and if he, I get the feeling it’s a he, isn’t complaining, so why should I?

I joined the club!

Ok, so I’m part of the club…

…when do I get to learn the secret handshake?

For a long time, I’ve been watching the iPhone crowd. Inside of me, there was this want, want, want. And now, I’ve finally bought one myself.

I had this, “kid at Christmas” feeling when I opened the little box for the first time. For some reason, I was a bit disappointed with the box even though that shouldn’t mean anything. Apple usually have boxes almost as thought out as the actual product.

But if the box wasn’t what I expected, the phone itself extended all my expectactions and more. I haven’t had it for more than a few weeks, but I’m already addicted. Has been from the first day actually.

Now that I’m part of the secret club I suppose I should do as all the other members, list my favorite apps. It’s a bit difficult, since I’m not only iPhone addicted, but even more app addicted.

Here are my top 5 apps:

5: Brizzly – if you have more than one twitter account is this the perfect app for you.

4: WordPress: If you have a wordpress blog, you really need this app to blog whenever you want.

3: Skype – call for free from your phone. Sadly I’ve heard that soon it won’t be free anymore. I hope they reconsider.

2: Dropbox – bring all your important files with you everywhere. You can also use it to transfer your files to your computer from your phone.

… and the winner is …

1: PingChat! Want to send text messages and mms for free? Then PingChat is what you want. They’re not real mms and texts, but it’s great for sending messages to other iPhone users. This app is actually the only one I’ve paid for. I’m a big spender when it comes to texting, so the upgrade has already been paid for if you calculate how much I usually pay for my communication.

From one phone provider to another, then back again

Phone providers, internet providers… providers of digital tv… For years now we struggled to switch away from one to another, and now suddenly, we’re going the other way. Twice in just a few months, salespeople from the provider we’re leaving, called and bullied mom, who is severely depressed, into signing up for new expensive services, that we might not even be able to use here, in my name or using my info, and her name. I’m surprised that’s even legal, quite apart from the lack of business ethics, not that people like that have morals.

So, my sister and I decided to move our phone subscriptions to the old provider. Back to them, you might say. In any case, we’re stuck with them for everything else – internet, digital tv, landline… So we thought why not move our mobile phone subscriptions to them too? When we left them they were more expensive than the ones we left them for, but now they’ve changed their prices.

I have to admit that I wanted this switch primarily to get back at the phone provider (the one we’re leaving). No one treats my mom that way, no one treats us that way and gets away with it. Besides, no matter who gets treated this way, it’s something that needs to be confronted.

Anyway, my sister called to give them a piece of her mind and fortunately, she was able to make them tear up the agreement, which probably wasn’t valid anyway.

I suppose that should make it alright, but grrr I’m so angry with them. That makes the third phone company we don’t like, for various reasons. Sigh. Maybe in a small country like ours, you can’t afford to be so picky, but at least so far, I don’t care. I’ll do as I like. (And don’t even get me started on salespeople in general…)

Star Trek Wallpapers!